2026-01-12 – Weekly Paralegal News : DOCX surcharge debate

Last week in our Paralegal community, discussions centered around practical tools and strategies. Members exchanged ideas on improving document management with checklists, debated the implications of new DOCX surcharges, and explored continuing education’s role in enhancing closing processes. Immigration-related topics, like understanding the difference between I-94 and visa stamps, also sparked engaging conversations.


This Week’s Hot Topics

Patent Center filing checklist template
An insightful thread about creating a checklist for Patent Center filings. This could be a game-changer for those juggling complex patent submissions.
Read more here

Client-friendly document checklists that work
Members are sharing their tried-and-true methods for making document checklists that clients actually find useful.
Read more here

DOCX surcharge and AI authorship disclaimers
A lively debate on the new DOCX surcharge and the need for AI authorship disclaimers—important for anyone handling filings.
Read more here

CE that actually helps closings
This discussion delves into continuing education that genuinely impacts your ability to close deals effectively.
Read more here

Tracking RFEs and client documents
Practical tips on keeping track of Requests for Evidence and client submissions—essential for maintaining your workflow.
Read more here

Your I-94, not your visa stamp
Clarifying the distinction between I-94 and visa stamps can save a lot of headaches—worth checking out if immigration is your area.
Read more here

Seeking a solid privilege log template
The quest for a reliable privilege log template—join in if you have insights or need some.
Read more here

Leveling up on copyright and contracts
For those wanting to deepen their understanding of copyright and contract law, this is a must-read.
Read more here

The USCIS reproduced signature quirk
An interesting issue with USCIS reproduced signatures—important for anyone dealing with these filings.
Read more here

Streamlining Patent Center and eCO workflows
Strategies to make your Patent Center and eCO processes more efficient—great for boosting productivity.
Read more here


Thank you for staying engaged and informed. Your contributions make this community a valuable resource for everyone involved.

On the DOCX surcharge, we moved to a clean DOCX template and run a preflight style check, then save a ‘shadow PDF’ to compare before e-filing; it’s cut formatting surprises and kept us out of fee trouble. Caveat: if there’s heavy math or odd formatting, we’ll file PDF and just ‘pay the toll’ rather than risk mangled text — confirm with your attorney on the best call for the matter.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​​‌‍​‌‌⁠​‍‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​​⁠‌⁠‌​‌​⁠‌‌‌‍‌‌‌⁠⁠‌​​‌‌‌​‍​‍⁠‌‌​‍⁠‌​⁠⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌‌‍‍​⁠‌‌‌​⁠‌‌​⁠⁠​⁠‍​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

We’ve had luck swapping the worst escape artists into recovery suits and adding a thin vet-wrap “grip” at the base of the e-collar so it doesn’t slide, per @JulesRVT’s trick. Just a heads-up: document any collar mods and get owner consent — improvised gear can be a liability, so follow clinic policy and, if there’s doubt, check with your practice’s attorney; a quick overview for clients here: https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/elizabethan-collars.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​​‌‍​‌‌⁠​‍‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠​‌​‍​‌⁠‍‍‌⁠​‍​⁠‍​‌‌‌​‌‍​⁠‌‍‍⁠‌‌​‍‌‌​⁠‌‍‍⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​‍‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‍‌‌‌​‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Building on @jcarter76’s template point, turning on Word’s “Embed fonts in the file” (Options > Save) before e-filing has kept our dashes/quotes and spacing stable when portals convert DOCX, but it can bump file size — anyone else seeing that?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​​‌‍​‌‌⁠​‍‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‌‌⁠​⁠‍‌‌​‍⁠‌​‍​‌‍‌​‌‌⁠⁠‌‍‍⁠‌‍‍‍‌​⁠‍‌​​‍‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌​‍‌‌‌‌‍​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Quick win: running Word’s “Document Inspector” (File > Info > Check for Issues) caught hidden track changes and embedded objects that seemed to coincide with DOCX surcharges for us; after stripping them, portal uploads stayed stable. Small caveat: we only embed fonts for headings — full embedding bloated size and sometimes got flagged — so if it still fusses, try saving as “Strict Open XML (.docx),” @hannah_b57. a lint roller for your file.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​​‌‍​‌‌⁠​‍‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌‌‌​​‌‌​‍‌‌⁠​⁠‌​‍⁠‌‌‌​‌‌‍‍‌​‍‍‌​⁠‌‌‍‌‍‌​‌​‌⁠‍​​‍⁠‌‌⁠​​‌⁠​​‌‌​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Switched to PDF/A-1b uploads and the “DOCX conversion fee” vanished on our portal, plus the spacing glitches stopped. I also batch‑flatten images/shapes before export since those seemed to trigger flags; one county still wants native, so check the local rule and loop in your attorney if it’s a close call. @hannah_b57 did you see the surcharge drop when you provided your own PDF?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​​‌‍​‌‌⁠​‍‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​‍​‌⁠‌‍‌​⁠⁠‌​⁠‍‌‌‌‌‌⁠​‍​⁠​​‌‌​⁠‌‍​‌‌‌‌‍‌⁠​‍‌‌‌​‌​‌⁠‌​‌​‌⁠‌‌​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​